AppId is over the quota
Ahead of Groupon‘s highly anticipated initial public offering in November, the Securities and Exchange Commission repeatedly pressed the daily deals giant to defend its business model and its accounting measures, according to comment letters recently disclosed.
The letters, sent by the S.E.C. from June 29 to Oct. 3, provide an interesting window into the back-and-forth discussions between the Internet company and its regulators in the months leading up to its I.P.O. In the letters, the S.E.C. seemed somewhat skeptical of Groupon’s business model and called on the company to balance its bullish statements with additional disclosures. Regulators also asked Groupon to address comments made by executives during the so-called quiet period, which seemed to defy S.E.C. rules.
Shares of Groupon slipped nearly 2 percent on Wednesday to close at $22.62 per share.
In the first letter, dated June 29, the S.E.C. outlines 73 comments, spanning 14 pages. Among the comments, regulators called on Groupon to list specific risk factors for its international operations, provide additional data on consumer attrition and repeat merchants and temper certain statements about the company’s growth prospects. In one section, for instance, the regulators advise the company to reframe a comment made by its chief executive, Andrew Mason, who had said in a filing that “Groupon is better positioned than any company in history to reshape local commerce,” to include the company’s “net losses and competitive landscape.”
In response to another statement made by Mr. Mason, that “our customers and merchants are all we care about,” the regulator reminded Groupon of its responsibility to its investors:
“Please balance the statements regarding the premise that your customers and merchants are all you care about with a discussion of your fiduciary duty to shareholders.”
As evident in the letters, the S.E.C. spent a lot of time parsing the statements of Groupon’s executives on and off the prospectus. In its first comment letter, regulators called on the company to address a Bloomberg News interview, during which Groupon’s co-founder, Eric P. Lefkofsky, said the not-yet-profitable Groupon was going to be “wildly profitable.” Several months later, the S.E.C. also asked the company to provide the full text of an internal e-mail sent by Mr. Mason, which was somehow leaked to the media.
Notably, the S.E.C. was particularly clear about its reservations on Acsoi, or adjusted consolidated segment operating income, an uncommon financial yardstick Groupon introduced in its first filing. In the June 29 letter, the S.E.C. said Acsoi — which is essentially operating profit stripped of marketing and acquisition costs — was somewhat misleading to prospective investors:
It appears that online marketing expense is a normal, recurring operating cash expenditure of the company. Your removal of this item from your results of operations creates a non-GAAP measure that is potentially misleading to readers. Please revise your non-GAAP measure accordingly.
The exchange between the S.E.C and Groupon, reveal the company’s initial resistance. In a July 14 letter to the S.E.C., the company tried to defend its math, arguing that Acsoi does include some expenses related to marketing for existing subscribers. The S.E.C. was not swayed, and in a subsequent letter, simply asked for its removal. On Oct. 10, Groupon complied in a revised filing.
No comments:
Post a Comment